← The board

MDMario Diaz-Balart

The Record · Florida

Mario Diaz-Balart

FL-26 · Republican · House

F1834 votes tracked · 6 of 8 subjects

The short version

Mario Diaz-Balart hurt women and families in 24 of the 34 votes we track.

What hurt women and families most

  • Voted against the 2022 gun safety law.

    What it means for herShe's 22 and just left a boyfriend who hit her. An abused woman whose abuser has a gun is about 5 times as likely to be killed. Before this 2022 law, a conviction for hitting her barred a husband from having a gun, but not a boyfriend she did not live with. Now it covers boyfriends too. Source: American Journal of Public Health, 2003

  • Voted for cutting food stamps by $39 billion.

    What it means for herShe's 34, a single mom of two, and works at a grocery store. Her pay is a bit over the usual limit for food stamps, but her state lets her family qualify. In 2013, 44% of SNAP participants were children. This bill would have ended that state option, and her family would have lost its food aid. Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2014

  • Voted for the 2025 law that cut Medicaid.

    What it means for herShe's 24, works part-time in Ohio with no insurance from her job, and hopes to have a baby someday. Medicaid pays for about 4 in 10 U.S. births. Starting in 2027 in most states, she must show 80 hours of work a month. If a slow month or a lost form cuts her off, she loses coverage before she is even pregnant. Source: KFF, 2025

Every vote we track

Hurt women and families24

  • Voted noThe 2022 gun safety law · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 22 and just left a boyfriend who hit her. An abused woman whose abuser has a gun is about 5 times as likely to be killed. Before this 2022 law, a conviction for hitting her barred a husband from having a gun, but not a boyfriend she did not live with. Now it covers boyfriends too. Source: American Journal of Public Health, 2003
    DetailsOfficial title: S.2938 — Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (concur in Senate amendment)From the official House roll call (2021–22, Roll Call 299): voted NAY.official roll call
  • Voted yesCutting food stamps by $39 billion · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 34, a single mom of two, and works at a grocery store. Her pay is a bit over the usual limit for food stamps, but her state lets her family qualify. In 2013, 44% of SNAP participants were children. This bill would have ended that state option, and her family would have lost its food aid. Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2014
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.3102 — Nutrition Reform and Work Opportunity Act, SNAP cuts (House passage, 2013)From the official House roll call (2013–14, Roll Call 476): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesThe 2025 law that cut Medicaid · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 24, works part-time in Ohio with no insurance from her job, and hopes to have a baby someday. Medicaid pays for about 4 in 10 U.S. births. Starting in 2027 in most states, she must show 80 hours of work a month. If a slow month or a lost form cuts her off, she loses coverage before she is even pregnant. Source: KFF, 2025
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.1 — 2025 reconciliation, Medicaid cuts (concur in Senate amendment, enacted)From the official House roll call (2025–26, Roll Call 190): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesRepealing the Affordable Care Act · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 28, buys her own insurance, and hopes to get pregnant next year. The Congressional Budget Office said this House bill would leave 23 million more people uninsured by 2026. It also let states apply to stop requiring plans like hers to cover maternity care. Source: Congressional Research Service, 2017
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.1628 — American Health Care Act (House passage)From the official House roll call (2017–18, Roll Call 256): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesPassing a narrower Violence Against Women Act · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 29, and a man she used to date keeps threatening her. More than 1 in 3 U.S. women have faced physical or sexual violence or stalking by a partner. VAWA pays for legal help, housing, and police training. This vote would have passed a narrower version that left out the new protections in the full bill. Source: CDC, National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey 2023/2024
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.1620 — Stefanik substitute narrowing VAWA 2021 (amendment, 2021)From the official House roll call (2021–22, Roll Call 85): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesAdding prison time to an existing born-alive law · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 22 weeks pregnant and just learned her baby has a fatal condition. Only 1.1% of U.S. abortions happen at 21 weeks or later. If her baby is born alive after an abortion, this bill would make her doctor send the baby to a hospital right away, even if it cannot survive, or face up to five years in prison. Source: CDC, Abortion Surveillance, 2024
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.21 — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (House passage)From the official House roll call (2025–26, Roll Call 27): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesAdding prison time to an existing born-alive law · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 22 weeks pregnant and just learned her baby has a fatal condition. Only 1.1% of U.S. abortions happen at 21 weeks or later. If her baby is born alive after an abortion, this bill would make her doctor send the baby to a hospital right away, even if it cannot survive, or face up to five years in prison. Source: CDC, Abortion Surveillance, 2024
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.26 — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (House passage, 2023)From the official House roll call (2023–24, Roll Call 29): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted noProtecting the right to birth control · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 19 and on the pill. Her right to birth control rests on Supreme Court rulings from 1965 and 1972. When the Court ended Roe in 2022, one justice wrote that it should rethink the 1965 ruling. This bill would have made birth control a right under federal law. Source: Dobbs v. Jackson, 2022, Thomas concurrence
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.8373 — Right to Contraception Act (House passage)From the official House roll call (2021–22, Roll Call 385): voted NAY.official roll call
  • Voted noProtecting abortion access in every state · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 27, pregnant, and lives in Texas. Texas is one of 13 states that ban almost all abortions. This bill would have protected abortion in every state until a fetus could survive outside the womb, and later when her life or health is at risk. Source: Guttmacher Institute, Sept. 2026
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.3755 — Women's Health Protection Act (House passage)From the official House roll call (2021–22, Roll Call 295): voted NAY.official roll call
  • Voted yesAdding prison time to an existing born-alive law · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 22 weeks pregnant and just learned her baby has a fatal condition. Only 1.1% of U.S. abortions happen at 21 weeks or later. If her baby is born alive after an abortion, this bill would make her doctor send the baby to a hospital right away, even if it cannot survive, or face up to five years in prison. Source: CDC, Abortion Surveillance, 2024
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.4712 — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (House passage, 2018)From the official House roll call (2017–18, Roll Call 36): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesLetting states cut Planned Parenthood from Title X · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 22, has no insurance, and gets birth control and cancer screening at Planned Parenthood. In a survey of Title X patients, 26 percent of those at a Planned Parenthood said it was the only place they could get the care they need. This 2017 law let states cut clinics like hers out of Title X money. Source: Guttmacher Institute, 2017
    DetailsOfficial title: H.J.Res.43 — Title X rule disapproval (House passage, 2017)From the official House roll call (2017–18, Roll Call 99): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesA permanent ban on federal money for abortion · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 30, self-employed in Illinois, and gets federal help paying for her marketplace plan. Illinois is one of 13 states that require plans like hers to cover abortion. This bill would have kept plans bought with federal help from covering abortion, and made the yearly ban on federal money for abortion permanent. Source: KFF, 2026
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.7 — No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act (House passage, 2017)From the official House roll call (2017–18, Roll Call 65): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesAdding prison time to an existing born-alive law · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 22 weeks pregnant and just learned her baby has a fatal condition. Only 1.1% of U.S. abortions happen at 21 weeks or later. If her baby is born alive after an abortion, this bill would make her doctor send the baby to a hospital right away, even if it cannot survive, or face up to five years in prison. Source: CDC, Abortion Surveillance, 2024
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.3504 — Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (House passage, 2015)From the official House roll call (2015–16, Roll Call 506): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesA permanent ban on federal money for abortion · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 30, self-employed in Illinois, and gets federal help paying for her marketplace plan. Illinois is one of 13 states that require plans like hers to cover abortion. This bill would have kept plans bought with federal help from covering abortion, and made the yearly ban on federal money for abortion permanent. Source: KFF, 2026
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.7 — No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act (House passage, 2015)From the official House roll call (2015–16, Roll Call 45): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesA permanent ban on federal money for abortion · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 30, self-employed in Illinois, and gets federal help paying for her marketplace plan. Illinois is one of 13 states that require plans like hers to cover abortion. This bill would have kept plans bought with federal help from covering abortion, and made the yearly ban on federal money for abortion permanent. Source: KFF, 2026
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.7 — No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act (House passage, 2014)From the official House roll call (2013–14, Roll Call 30): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesCutting child care money to states over rule-breaking · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 26, a single mom who works at a nursing home. A state subsidy pays for her son's day care. About 1.3 million children get this help each month. When a state breaks the program's rules, this bill would force extra penalties, which can include cutting off its grant. If her state lost it, she could lose her help. Source: Administration for Children and Families, 2026
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.7726 — No Funds for Repeat Child Care Violations Act (House passage)From the official House roll call (2025–26, Roll Call 198): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted no$50 billion to keep child care open in COVID · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 29, a nurse's aide and a single mom, and her daughter's day care closed in the spring of 2020. Nearly 13,000 child day care businesses closed that spring. This bill would have given $50 billion to help child care providers stay open or reopen. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2024
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.7027 — Child Care Is Essential Act (House passage, 2020)From the official House roll call (2019–20, Roll Call 171): voted NAY.official roll call
  • Voted noLowering drug prices · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 68, on Medicare, and takes insulin for diabetes. Since 2023, this law has capped her insulin at $35 a month. Since 2025, it has also capped what she pays each year for her Medicare drugs. Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2023
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.5376 — Inflation Reduction Act (concur in Senate amendment)From the official House roll call (2021–22, Roll Call 420): voted NAY.official roll call
  • Voted noRestoring the Voting Rights Act · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 70, Black, and lives in Georgia. Until 2013, her state needed federal approval before changing voting rules, like closing polling places. After the Supreme Court ended that, places that had needed approval closed 1,688 polling places by 2018. This bill would have brought the check back. Source: Leadership Conference Education Fund, 2019
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.4 — John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act (House passage)From the official House roll call (2021–22, Roll Call 260): voted NAY.official roll call
  • Voted noEqual pay for women · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 40 and just learned a man in her job earns more. Across all jobs, women working full time earn about 84 cents for every dollar men earn. This bill would have made it illegal to punish her for asking coworkers about pay, and harder for her boss to explain the gap away. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2026
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.7 — Paycheck Fairness Act (House passage)From the official House roll call (2021–22, Roll Call 108): voted NAY.official roll call
  • Voted yesOverturning the 2024 Title IX rule · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 19, in college, and a classmate sexually assaulted her. Among college women, only 20% of rapes and sexual assaults are reported to police. The 2024 rule widened what her school must do when she reports it. This vote would have thrown that rule out. Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2014
    DetailsOfficial title: H.J.Res.165 — overturning the 2024 Title IX rule (House passage, 2024)From the official House roll call (2023–24, Roll Call 354): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesThe 2017 tax law · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 30, healthy, and buys her own insurance. This 2017 law set the fine for going without insurance to $0. At the time, the Congressional Budget Office said that would raise premiums on plans like hers about 10 percent and leave 13 million more people uninsured by 2027. Source: Congressional Budget Office, 2017
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.1 — Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (final concurrence, enacted)From the official House roll call (2017–18, Roll Call 699): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesLeaving non-citizens out of the count for House seats · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 34, has a green card, and works as a home health aide in Florida. Her two children are U.S. citizens. About 13 million people with green cards live in the U.S. The Constitution counts every person. This bill would have left her out of the count that decides her state's seats in the U.S. House. Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Office of Homeland Security Statistics, 2026
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.7109 — Equal Representation Act, census citizenship question (House passage, 2024)From the official House roll call (2023–24, Roll Call 193): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted noGuarding the census from untested questions · Hurt women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 35, a U.S. citizen, and lives with her mother, who is not a citizen. The Census Bureau predicted a 5.1% drop in responses from homes like hers if a citizenship question were added to the 2020 census. This bill would have barred new census questions unless they were tested and shown to Congress first. Source: U.S. Supreme Court, Department of Commerce v. New York, 2019
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.8326 — Ensuring a Fair and Accurate Census Act (House passage, 2022)From the official House roll call (2021–22, Roll Call 435): voted NAY.official roll call

Helped women and families10

  • Voted yesA bigger Child Tax Credit · Helped women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's raising two kids alone on a low-wage job. Because the credit grows with earnings, she gets less of it than families who earn more. This bill would have raised the credit for about 16 million children in families like hers in its first year. Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 2024
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.7024 — Child Tax Credit expansion (House passage)From the official House roll call (2023–24, Roll Call 30): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted noPassing a narrower Violence Against Women Act · Helped women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 29, and a man she used to date keeps threatening her. More than 1 in 3 U.S. women have faced physical or sexual violence or stalking by a partner. VAWA pays for legal help, housing, and police training. This vote would have passed a narrower version that left out the new protections in the full bill. Source: CDC, National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey 2023/2024
    DetailsOfficial title: S.47 — House Republican substitute narrowing VAWA 2013 (amendment, 2013)From the official House roll call (2013–14, Roll Call 54): voted NAY.official roll call
  • Voted yesBetter maternity care for women veterans · Helped women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 31, an Army veteran with PTSD, and pregnant with her first child. From 2017 through 2019, mental health conditions caused 23 percent of pregnancy-related deaths, more than any other cause. This 2021 law makes the VA keep a program that helps her get care, and trains outside doctors on veterans' mental health needs. Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2024
    DetailsOfficial title: S.796 — Protecting Moms Who Served Act (House passage, 2021)From the official House roll call (2021–22, Roll Call 374): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesRenewing help for trafficking victims · Helped women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 16, and a man she met online is selling her for sex. In confirmed U.S. sex trafficking cases, 94% of victims were female. These bills renew or expand federal programs that help victims like her get safe and punish traffickers. Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2011
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.5856 — Trafficking Victims Reauthorization Act of 2023 (House passage, 2024)From the official House roll call (2023–24, Roll Call 41): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesRenewing help for trafficking victims · Helped women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 16, and a man she met online is selling her for sex. In confirmed U.S. sex trafficking cases, 94% of victims were female. These bills renew or expand federal programs that help victims like her get safe and punish traffickers. Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2011
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.6552 — Trafficking Victims Reauthorization Act of 2022 (House passage, 2022)From the official House roll call (2021–22, Roll Call 388): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesThe Violence Against Women Act · Helped women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 35 and leaving a husband who hurts her. More than 1 in 3 women in the U.S. have faced physical or sexual violence or stalking by a partner. This law pays for the legal help, housing and other support she can turn to. Source: CDC, 2026
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.1620 — VAWA Reauthorization of 2021 (House passage)From the official House roll call (2021–22, Roll Call 86): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesRenewing help for trafficking victims · Helped women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 16, and a man she met online is selling her for sex. In confirmed U.S. sex trafficking cases, 94% of victims were female. These bills renew or expand federal programs that help victims like her get safe and punish traffickers. Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2011
    DetailsOfficial title: H.R.2200 — Frederick Douglass Trafficking Victims Reauthorization Act (House passage, 2018)From the official House roll call (2017–18, Roll Call 487): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesRenewing help for trafficking victims · Helped women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 16, and a man she met online is selling her for sex. In confirmed U.S. sex trafficking cases, 94% of victims were female. These bills renew or expand federal programs that help victims like her get safe and punish traffickers. Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2011
    DetailsOfficial title: S.1862 — Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2017 (House passage, 2018)From the official House roll call (2017–18, Roll Call 491): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesRenewing help for trafficking victims · Helped women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's 16, and a man she met online is selling her for sex. In confirmed U.S. sex trafficking cases, 94% of victims were female. These bills renew or expand federal programs that help victims like her get safe and punish traffickers. Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2011
    DetailsOfficial title: S.178 — Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act (House passage, 2015)From the official House roll call (2015–16, Roll Call 244): voted YEA.official roll call
  • Voted yesThe Violence Against Women Act · Helped women and familiesWhat it means for herShe's Native, lives on her tribe's land, and her husband is not Native. Before this 2013 law, if he beat her, her tribe's courts could not charge him. Almost all Native women who face violence, 97 percent, were hurt by at least one person who is not Native. Source: National Institute of Justice, 2016
    DetailsOfficial title: S.47 (2013) — VAWA Reauthorization (House passage)From the official House roll call (2013–14, Roll Call 55): voted YEA.official roll call
How we count

We wrote down which bills and nominations count, and why, before we scored anyone. A vote counts as hurting women and families when it takes away care, coverage, safety or rights, and as helping when it protects them. A missed vote never counts against anyone. Money and court cases are shown, but never change the grade.

THE DOWNSTREAM-RECORD RULE also governs agency-leadership confirmations here, under the same three constraints as Judicial & structural: symmetric, applied to every confirmation in the dimension, and the later event cited like any other evidence. Who runs CDC, NIH or FDA is a vote about what that person will then do.

Read the full method

Labora Collective

The Record is free. So is The Dispatch.

Labora Collective is a women’s health community led by doctors. The Dispatch is its newsletter.

Get The Dispatch

We only write when there is something worth reading.